The Real Story Of Beef

7-09-2021

 
     Progressive liberals seem to dominate the information sources today. They strive for constant change. It does not matter if the change is for the worse; change for change's sake. Nutritional information was effected in the 1960's when radical animal rightists influenced the government's teaching on diet. They attempted to force the elimination of all animal products from the diet of The  United States. Beef had long been considered to be the best source available. As the animal rightists gained influence beef and pork began moving from the top the the food chain and grain and vegetable proteins began moving up.

      The introduction and adoption of the food pyramid furthered the move to replace meat protein with poorer quality proteins. This change was not influenced by science but by liberals who wanted to control and change the thinking of our country.

       What is left out of the conversation about nutrition is the scientific facts pointing to superiority of meat protein.  A 3 ounce cooked portion of beef supplies 50% fn the daily protein requirement. But not just any protein, a complete protein with all 24 essential amino acids. Protein and other nutrients supplied by beef are assimilated into the body at a very high rate.

        Nothing is said about how many problems such as the increase in child obesity and the increase in food allergies that have come about as the modern diet has gained acceptance.  

This page will be expanded soon.

 

The Real Story of Beef

Hormones in Beef

Question: What hormones?

 
 
 

These Sites Are From The National Cattlemen's Beef Association

Beef.org Logo

BIFSCO Logo - White   BQA - White   BIFSCO Logo - White
  Chuck Knows Beef   Masters of Beef Advocacy Logo

 

   

BIWFD Horizontal White

   

 

 

Beef

Information Sources

 

 

Cow and Greenhouse Gasses

Information About

Mad Cow Disease or BSE

The False BSE Scare

Hormones in Beef

Beef It's What For dinner

Beef Nutrition Organization

School Wellness board

Facts About Beef

BEEF RESEARCH .org

Cow and Greenhpuse Gasses

What's The Beef About

Grass Fed or Grain Fed

 

   

Deserve American Beef

 

Grass/Grain

The Truth About The

Grass Fed Verses Grain Fed

Beef Discussion

First: The actual term used should be finished not fed.

     When beef is discussed most think of the "beef breeds' such as Angus, Hereford, or Shorthorn. These cattle all eat grass for some of their life. All of them are grass fed. Most of the calves remain on pasture until they weigh 600-900 pounds. Than they are moved to finishing lots where they are fed diets of forage (silage, hay, ect.) with grain added. If they are fed strictly grain diets it is the last 100 plus days before they are slaughtered. Very few are ever fed a strict grain diet; very few beef breed cattle are even finished on a strict diet of only grain.

      Calves that go to the slaughterhouse directly off pasture are grass fed and also grass finished. So if the discussion is legitimate the terms grain finished and grass finished must be used.

      It is true some Holstein steers (dairy breed) are fed a diet of mostly grain from a very young age. These could be rightly called grain fed and grain finished.

Be sure those who want to discuss this issue with use the right terms!          

 

What is not usually discussed

The amount of grain and the length of time grain is fed to the cattle will have an affect on the omega-3 levels.

Have you ever heard that grain is not a natural part of a cow's diet? The fact is grain is a natural part of the diet of cattle. Grazing cattle will often eat mature grass that has "headed out" (produced seed). Seed is a type of grain. In fact some types of headed out grass will seed that will produce choice beef that is just like corn or other grain finished beef.

If environmental issues are used in the discussion consider these statements

Cattle fed diets containing grain will gain weight faster than cattle fed strictly grass. A 1000 lb. grass finished steer will be several months older than a 1000 finished steer that had grain added to it's diet. The type and amount of grain fed will effect the finished age. The 1000 lb. steer finished on a diet containing grain will yield more pounds of beef than a steer fed a grass only diet.

All cattle produce methane gas and manure even grass finished cattle. The discussion should be the amount produced per pound of beef.

Confined feedlots have to have manure management plans filed with EPA and other government agencies. The manure is a valuable fertilizer. It used in a managed, efficient way. The manure is tested regularly to confirm the nutrient content and how it should be applied to farm ground.

 
 

 

Do cows cause global warming?

  • Answer: Experts agree livestock production accounts for a very small percentage of USA greenhouse gases (GHG). Cattlemen care about the environment and believe in leaving the environment in better shape for the next generation. Preserving our country's natural resources is as important to cattlemen as it is to consumers.

  • Facts: Recent government research and data show raising livestock accounts for just 3%-4% of the  GHG emissions. In 2016 Agricultural industry was responsible for only 9% of the total GHG emissions in the USA. EPA https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/sources-greenhouse-gas-emissions

  • Many world experts cite the USA cattle industry as the model the world should be following.

  • The USA produces 20% of the worlds beef with only 10% of the world's cattle.

  • There are about 30,000,000 fewer cattle in the USA today than in 1975 yet we produce more beef.

  • Emissions or sequestration of CO2, CH4 and N2O can occur from management of lands in their current use or as lands are converted to other uses. Carbon dioxide is exchanged between the atmosphere and the plants and soils on land, for example, as cropland is converted into grassland, as lands are cultivated for crops, or as forests grow. In addition, using biological feedstocks (such as energy crops or wood) for purposes such as electricity generation, as inputs to processes that create liquid fuels, or as building materials can lead to emissions or sequestration.* In the United States overall, since 1990, Land Use, Land-Use Change, and Forestry  (LULUCF) activities have resulted in more removal of CO2 from the atmosphere than emissions. Because of this, the LULUCF sector in the United States is considered a net sink, rather than a source, of CO2 over this time-period. In many areas of the world, the opposite is true, particularly in countries where large areas of forest land are cleared, often for conversion to agricultural purposes or for settlements. In these situations, the LULUCF sector can be a net source of greenhouse gas emissions. https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/inventory-us-greenhouse-gas-emissions-and-sinks    https://www.eia.gov/